Monthly Archives June 2011

Feuerbach and The Essence of Religion

Van Harvey's claim that Feuerbach's Essence of Religion[1] presents an important advance over The Essence of Christianity[2] rings true to me in several ways.  To understand why, it is necessary to first briefly outline Feuerbach's argument in Christianity.
Read More

Kierkegaard and Barth on “mediation”

Barth and Kierkegaard may each in his own way be seen as voices of resistance against the trends inherent in the liberal theology of their respective milieus.  In Fear and Trembling[1], we see Kierkegaard's protest against the totalizing philosophy of the Hegelians.  Some 75 years later Barth's Epistle to the Romans[2] would cite Kierkegaard's "leap of faith" in Barth's own objection to the comfortable way in which God had been brought to the level of an object within the realm of human understanding.  Both authors reject what might be referred to as "mediation," or rational explanations of encounters between human
Read More

Schleiermacher and the Intuition of the Infinite

If you haven't experienced the intuition of the infinite, then Schleiermacher believes he can lead you only so far.  While he can attempt to outline the journey, in the end you have to experience it for yourself.  Past a certain point, anything he has to say about it will become incomprehensible.  But through the intersubjectivity of a community that finds at its root just such an intuition, you may find your way.
Read More

Kant on Atonement

In his Religion[1] Kant lays out an atonement model whose initial dynamics look very much like those of Anselm of Canterbury.  However, in keeping with his commitments to outlining a religion using human reason alone, Kant then eschews any metaphysical discussion of Jesus as God incarnate and vicarious restitution owed by humanity which only God can make, offering instead an alternative model for satisfaction.
Read More