Bryce E. Rich fides quaerens intellectum

ArchiveJune 2011

Kierkegaard and Barth on “mediation”

K

Barth and Kierkegaard may each in his own way be seen as voices of resistance against the trends inherent in the liberal theology of their respective milieus.  In Fear and Trembling[1], we see Kierkegaard's protest against the totalizing philosophy of the Hegelians.  Some 75 years later Barth's Epistle to the Romans[2] would cite Kierkegaard's "leap of faith" in Barth's own objection to the...

Schleiermacher and the Intuition of the Infinite

S

If you haven't experienced the intuition of the infinite, then Schleiermacher believes he can lead you only so far.  While he can attempt to outline the journey, in the end you have to experience it for yourself.  Past a certain point, anything he has to say about it will become incomprehensible.  But through the intersubjectivity of a community that finds at its root just such an intuition, you...

Kant on Atonement

K

In his Religion[1] Kant lays out an atonement model whose initial dynamics look very much like those of Anselm of Canterbury.  However, in keeping with his commitments to outlining a religion using human reason alone, Kant then eschews any metaphysical discussion of Jesus as God incarnate and vicarious restitution owed by humanity which only God can make, offering instead an alternative model for...

Bryce E. Rich fides quaerens intellectum

Categories

Tags